Editorial: General Motors Death Watch 210: Abandon Ship

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

With a bit of luck, I’ll finish this editorial before House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tells America how Washington will save Detroit by spending your tax money on a domestic automobile industry beyond salvation. I doubt it. As we’ve previously reported, our duly elected representatives have already met with the titanic captains of Ford, GM, Chrysler and the U.A.W. in a closed-door session. I’m sure they got their ducks— and our bucks— in a row. Nancy will sing an ode to the working man and pen a paean to the importance of American heavy industry. Grim faces will then face a grim task: figuring out the fastest way to put Ford, GM and Chrysler on federally-funded life support.

GM first, of course. It’s out of money. Today’s third quarter financial report admits that the American automaker doesn’t have enough cash to last until the end of the year (actually next month). While GM’s impending implosion virtually guarantees prompt federal mammary provision, “prompt” may not be good enough. In truth, GM is a breached and rudderless ship slipping into a sea of red ink. If Pelosi and pals don’t get the bailout done in a couple of weeks, the public will see GM’s situation as one that’s beyond repair.

Now that the GM bankruptcy story has “broken,” the mainstream media will start asking the tough questions that TTAC’s been asking for years. Such as, who is this NSFW who’s run GM into an iceberg, and ram it repeatedly? Why was this corporate helmsman paid over $100m in salary and benefits to do so? (Someone might even mention Wagoner’s bankruptcy-proof pension.) Why should we believe a thing he says? And why is he still here?

When Congress doled-out $700b to the financial industry, the average American had no clue what the Hell the money was for, why it was needed and what was going to be done with it. Credit swaps? Sub-what? They revolted. And then the stock market dropped and the bailout bill passed. But cars are a different matter. Cars they know. What are the chances that GM’s going to build a car I want to buy using my tax money? Sure, I want to protect jobs. But I also want to protect my tax money. So… screw it.

GM has but one weapon to counteract this argument: the plug-in hybrid electric – gas Chevrolet Volt. The Volt is a damp squib stuck in development Hell. GM may have fooled the financial community (and itself) with its constant talk of the next Next Big Thing, but with gas prices hovering at $2 a gallon, the wind has gone out of the Volt’s sails (sales?). It’s too much, too late.

Detroit’s bailout backers face another problem: there is an alternative.

Our anonymous contributor’s pro-bankruptcy editorial contains the kernels of a GM bailout backlash, based on sound business principles. Once Ms. Pelosi’s emotional appeal to working class values loses its emotional resonance, pundits will argue against “throwing good money after bad.” The General’s public will cotton-on to the idea that it’s not a case of bailout or die. It’s a case of bailout AND die.

As Bill O’Reilly would say, the bailout bonanza also has an “unresolved problem” segment. Cerberus. Chrysler’s owners are a deep-pocketed private equity firm. If they glom onto a federal bailout– and ChryCo CEO Bob Nardelli was in that room with Pelosi– voters will NOT be happy subsidizing Feinberg’s fat cats. Or, for that matter, the Ford family, who still control The Blue Oval through their special class of stock.

It’s no wonder we’re hearing rumblings that Detroit is willing to consider taking federal bailout bucks with ”strings” attached. They recognize that the PR war– and thus the bailout itself– is not a done deal. They know they need to appear “willing to work” with legislators to “ensure that taxpayers’ money is protected.” Yada yada yada. Just get this thing done. Whatever it takes.

Of course, the truth of the matter is that there’s nothing federal funds can do to “save” Detroit. Chrysler is a basket case, and Ford and GM have no long-term future without a Chapter 11 reorganization.

Under C11 protections, using debtor-in-possession financing, GM and Ford can shed onerous labor contracts, kill brands, terminate dealers and get out from underneath mountainous debt and build something American want to buy. In fact, there’s only one way the feds can help GM and Ford, and the hundreds of thousands of current and former workers who depend on their survival: withhold our money from their coffers.

GM is dead. Chapter 11 is the only method by which a new GM can rise from its ashes.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 76 comments
  • AG AG on Nov 08, 2008

    I respect the fact that the African-American community is proud to see such an intelligent and gifted black man like Barack Obama become leader of this country, but in the end, he's just another DLC Corporate Democrat. It reminded me of that swift hand gesture McCain made when the crowd started booing Obama's name during his concession speech. Its getting harder and harder for the leaders of both of these Big Business parties to tolerate the people they have to pander to every 4 years in order to stay in power. Throughout the postwar era, American politicians have been tasked by Wall Street and Big Business with maintaining political stability in this country because that's whats good for business. Now that American Capitalism stands on the precipice, that's becoming harder and harder to do. We accuse politicians of being radical not because they are, but because WE are. Americans believe in decisive action and we feel like with the economy on the verge of collapse, decisive action is necessary. I'm sure you might think I sound conspiratorial, but if by conspiratorial you mean blatantly obvious, you'd be right

  • MgoBLUE MgoBLUE on Nov 10, 2008

    @PCH101 +1

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next