Bailout Watch 191: The Battle Lines Are Drawn

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

We’ve already reported that the White House isn’t keen on Democratic plans for a Motown bailout. As Automotive News [sub] reminds us, George W. doesn’t want the dems to appropriate the $700b appropriation earmarked for bailing out America’s financial system. As an alternative, the Prez signaled Pelso, Reid & Co. that he’s OK with the idea of “diverting” some of the Department of Energy’s $25b no to low-interest retooling loan program to bailout Chrysler, Ford and GM. Only the Democrats do not, I repeat DO NOT, want to be seen to be watering-down their commitment to encouraging forcing The Big 2.8 to build fuel-efficient vehicles. So… Nancy Pelosi told the press today that the U.S. automobile manufacturers need to restructure “to ensure their long-term economic viability.” Huh? Sorry, I got distracted. I mean, WTF does she mean by “restructure” and do we really want a politician deciding how Motown goes about it business? Right. OK. Nancy is digging-in, sticking with her TARP usurpation strategy. Here’s the money shot [via Bloomberg]:

“In a statement issued in Washington, Pelosi also said that the ‘appropriate source of funding for this short-term assistance is the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) recently authorized by Congress… Any effort to divert funds from the advanced technology initiative contained in Section 136 of last year’s energy bill is a step backward in assuring the viability and competitiveness of the U.S. auto industry.'” If you think this is bad, just imagine what it would be like if the U.S. government takes an equity stake in Chrysler, Ford and GM and sicks a Car Czar on them. While it would make for great TTACitude, trust me, you don’t want to go there.

The timeline for this bailout battle: Monday, the dems unveil their grand plan. Tuesday, rep. Barney Frank (he of the Fannie Mae debacle) opens the circus with bailout details. Wednesday, the CEO of The Big 2.8 and union boss Big Ron Gettelfinger appear in front of Frank’s committee to rattling their begging bowl and– thank God– face the music. Live. On C-Span. As much as we like Knight Rider, limited resources mean that we’ll be live-blogging their appearance on your behalf, and living KR to the capable hands of the blissfully married Alex Nunez, of Autoblog fame.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Stein X Leikanger Stein X Leikanger on Nov 15, 2008

    @Auto Repair Mechanic Maybe modify the Clancy-idea like this: Declare that in order to save the US auto industry - cars sold in the US must be built in the US. State that US manufacturers will apply this rule abroad, and only sell cars in foreign countries that have been built in these, or in their economic areas.

  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Nov 16, 2008

    @ppellico: "Why would or should Bush aid a group that has always voted and lobbied against him? The UAW is the epitomy of anti conservative government." Since when is Bush a conservative? News to me.

  • FreedMike Um, OK. EVs are just cars, folks. I have no idea why they take up so much rent-free space in some folks' heads.
  • Analoggrotto *What's the most famous track you have driven on while Hyundai foots the bill?
  • 2ACL I'm pretty sure you've done at least one tC for UCOTD, Tim. I want to say that you've also done a first-gen xB. . .It's my idea of an urban trucklet, though the 2.4 is a potential oil burner. Would been interested in learning why it was totaled and why someone decided to save it.
  • Akear You know I meant stock. Don't type when driving.
  • JMII I may just be one person my wife's next vehicle (in 1 or 2 years) will likely be an EV. My brother just got a Tesla Model Y that he describes as a perfectly suitable "appliance". And before lumping us into some category take note I daily drive a 6.2l V8 manual RWD vehicle and my brother's other vehicles are two Porsches, one of which is a dedicated track car. I use the best tool for the job, and for most driving tasks an EV would checks all the boxes. Of course I'm not trying to tow my boat or drive two states away using one because that wouldn't be a good fit for the technology.
Next