By on September 17, 2008

Tesla Motors says it’s secured 90 acres between San Jose and Santa Clara, CA to build its world headquarters. Oh, and production facilities for its (supposedly) upcoming Model S (nee White Star) sedan. The announcement is creating all kinds of excitement among the kind of people who use terms like “green collar jobs” and “cleantech.” “It’s not just another solar company,” says San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed. “It’s an electric car, which has tremendous upside for us, and a whole new area of job potential.” And of course that excitement translates into taxpayer handout. The San Jose Mercury reports that the City of San Jose will sign a 40-year lease with Tesla for the land, providing the first 10 years rent-free. “In years 11 to 20, Tesla will pay $1.5 million a year for the property, and then see rent increases of 2 percent a year in years 21 to 40. Tesla will pay the usual development fees… but the city will look for a way to rebate them over time once tax revenues start flowing in from the company.” Governator Schwarzenegger has already offered to waive sales taxes on the first $100m of equipment purchased for the factory (angering not a few non-automotive manufacturers). And the plant is being built using a $150m federal Department of Energy loan guarantee. Hey, what happened to the whole Tesla in New Mexico deal? Nothing.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!


8 Comments on “Tesla Death Watch 20: California Dreamin’...”

  • avatar

    Governator Schwarzenegger has already offered to waive sales taxes on the first $100m of equipment purchased for the factory (angering not a few non-automotive manufacturers).

    And, how about the citizens of Kaleefornya. The state still doesn’t have a budget. Previously proposed budgets have tried to use smoke and mirrors to make a $15 billion dollar deficit go away. And the governor’s proposed budget included a sales tax increase. Yet, he wants to waive the sales tax on up to $100m ($7.25M at the current rate) in equipment for Tesla!? You know $7M here, $5M there, and eventually it adds up to some real money.

  • avatar

    It’s reassuring to know that there’s a place for Baghdad Bob Lutz to work when GM goes tango uniform.

  • avatar

    And the funny thing is the company will go under before 10 years has passed when the populace and Hollywood celebs realize the mileage and emissions figures are about the same as modern turbodiesels and one can kill the battery after a few deep discharges.

  • avatar

    Looking at the picture, and reading the presentation, well, most sounds like it’s cut out of a low-budget Sci-Fi movie. “Dark Star” drive train (it’ll be dark alright), 110+ mpg, acceleration under 6 seconds. And the magic words, “Sports Sedan”. Doesn’t all this clash against the concept of cheap energy efficient and non-polluting transportation? Oh, wait, it’s all smoke and mirrors…

  • avatar

    marc_m – Tesla’s never been about cheap, and there’s no way to build a ‘cheap’ EV. The problem with Tesla to date has been that Elon Musk’s money brings Elon Musk with it, and his absolute devotion to making the perfect the enemy of the good has delayed the Roadster by years.

    Deciding to build in California, no matter the incentives offered, is pandering to image over business common sense.

  • avatar

    Surprised that Telsa who I’d guess want to make a profit would settle in Southern CA where everything is expensive instead of the south east US where there is cheap land, cheap labor, and cheap parts suppliers all over.

    Good luck to them. America needs their EVs. I look forward to the version that people of more modest means can afford.

  • avatar

    Tesla settling in CA is just further proof that this company is about marketing and hype and not about mass producing cars. Joeaverage: don’t hold your breath.

  • avatar

    I suppose their big argument would be that they are settling nearest their potential customers.

    Rich people, mild weather where batteries behave better, and where the mindset might be more friendly to the EV concept.

    Maybe the Tesla people just want to live in CA. Didn’t Nissan have a hard time getting everybody to move to Tennessee? Nissan obviously thought they would save some cash being here.

    Still build them in the southeast and sell them everywhere. Would be a BIG savings.

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lorenzo: I doubt Fiat/FCA was part of any German cartel. It looks like plain, old piling on for cash. Now that a...
  • ChesterChi: This one is worth $10,995 because it used to be owned by Jon Voight
  • eyeofthetiger: For $25K, I will expect it to come with a handful of spice.
  • thalter: My understanding is that the main problem with the V6 engines is that the urea tank is undersized, so as not...
  • Southern Perspective: 1956 New Yorker /405171-2.jpg

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States