Bailout Watch 38: GM President Does His Own Spinning

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Troy Clarke, President of GM’s North American operations, decided answer back on some issues plaguing GM while addressing students at Southern Methodist University (home of the George W. Bush Presidential Library). Clark started with the usual PR blurb; GM is one of the largest auto manufacturers in the world, and that they bring us household brands, like Chevrolet, Buick, Saturn, Pontiac, Hummer and Cadillac. Well, until they kill Pontiac and sell off Hummer. And Buick slips in the shower and dies. While we could read into Clarke’s reference to GM as “one of” the world’s largest automakers rather than calling it “the largest,” there were other gems from the presentation. Clarke went on to trumpet GM’s phenomenal fuel economy stable: they have 18 models that get 30 mpg or better. Ray Wert trashed this myth previously: these 18 cars represent 30% of GM’s overall line up, whereas Toyota’s and Honda’s 30+mpg club represents 55 and 60%, respectively. Then came the thorny issue of “the bailout”. Or not. Because it’s not a bailout. Is it? Clarke told the crowd that actually, it’s not a bailout. It’s just a return for the taxpayer. Nice! “Congress has mandated an industry average of 35 mpg or better by 2020,” Clarke said. “This was the figure that they thought was reasonable and would not bankrupt the car companies, but it just depends on how valuable sooner results in this facet are to the American taxpayer.” Fancy that! Even though, I’m not a United States’ taxpayer, I’d hazard a guess that citizens would want their taxes spent on things like roads, defense and fixing social security, rather than a company run into the ground by clueless executives.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Areitu Areitu on Sep 12, 2008

    monkeyboy: Check out what happened (or didn't happen) at a recent military march of a holiday in N. Korea recently. blindfaith : An American family-owned business the rights to an additive that a number of German machines needed and managed to make a lot of money off of that during the war.

  • Redbarchetta Redbarchetta on Sep 12, 2008
    blindfaith I'm not sure who you think was trying to recreate history. No one is saying they didn't manufacture a lot of weapons during WW2 but that was 60 years ago. We need steel, ships, munitions, air planes, banking, food etc., right here. We have all that here already, not sure what your point is. My point was we have dedicated military manufacturers and if added capacity is needed again it can be handle just the same as before but using Toyota, Honda, etc. You must forget that Americans work in those places, just because they aren't UAW branded doesn't mean they wouldn't jump right into the effort. And the government has the capacity to use those factories, labor and resources as they need during a wartime effort, whether the owners like it or not, just look at GM and Ford production in Germany under Hitler. The Big 2.8 can barely handle the car biz handing over highly advanced weapons production to them might not work out to well, something they would have to be accountable for. Would you want your life to rely on a Chrysler build tank transmission. Just because they don't get bailed out doesn't mean they will disappear, they just wouldn't continue on in the form you are used to, it's called evolving. Propping them up doesn't force them to change to meet the times. Toyota isn’t going to come to our aid if North Korea goes ballistic. Japan is reliant on teh US for their defence, especialy in a major conflict, if we get hit they get hit worse. Last time I looked at a map North Korea and Japan weren't that far apart and don't have good relations. Toyota, Honda and Nissan would probably offer up their factories, labor, and money before we even asked if any sort of conflict that might threaten them were to happen. I agree that we import way too much stuff. We need to start making our own stuff in house and quit buying cheap disposable crap. Man I hate Walmart.
  • MaintenanceCosts Just here to say thanks for the gorgeous picture of Vancouver, which may be my favorite city in the world.
  • TheMrFreeze I don't doubt that trying to manage a company like Stellantis that's made up of so many disparate automakers is a challenge, but Tavares asking for so much money is simply bad form. With the recent UAW strike and the industry still in turmoil, now is not the time. And as somebody with a driveway full of FCA products, I'd just like to say how much I miss Sergio and FCA. At least with him Chrysler and Dodge stood a chance of long term survival...
  • TheMrFreeze None of my cars are worthy of actual summer performance tires but our daily drivers do run all-seasons from about now until November, then winter tires the rest of the year because we're well into the snow belt. I always make sure the all-seasons I buy have good winter tire performance too, just in case we get caught with a very late or early winter storm
  • Akear The front reminds me of the Pontiac Aztec, though it does look better than that infamous vehicle. I predict they will sell about 5,000 of these annually.
  • Chris Teague I'm putting the Pilot Sport 4s back on my GR Corolla next week, so all of New England can thank me for the late spring snow storm we'll undoubtedly have right after that.
Next