GM's Facts and Fiction, or Vice Versa

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Frank’s preparing to tackle the new GM website, GMfactsandfiction.com. Meanwhile, I was amused to find a link in the right hand column sending me to an August 1 Wall Street Journal Marketwatch blog. Ostensibly, GM wanted me to read a remark by house spinmeister Tom Wilkinson’s defending The General’s honor. [Quoting yourself is like the joke about the falling American tourist trade in post-911 Paris: the waiters were reduced to insulting each other.] But I got caught up in the blog post itself, filled as it is with its own set of facts. Or perhaps we should call them inconvenient truths?

“Shares of General Motors are down 6.2% after the company reported a staggering $15 billion loss for the second quarter, as a result of declining sales, losses on leases, lots of debt, high energy prices, and just about anything else that could go wrong with a company.

Here’s a list of some numbers to put the earnings report in perspective:

  • $15.471 billion: GM’s loss for the entire quarter.
  • $11.68 billion: ExxonMobil’s profit for the quarter.
  • $6.267 billion: The market capitalization of General Motors as of this morning, according to WSJ.com.
  • $7.512 billion: The market capitalization of Clorox, which reported net income of $158 million for its most recent quarter.
  • $3.6 billion. GM’s cash burn during the quarter, according to Citigroup, who said that “weak fundamentals, low visibility and inherently slow company turnarounds stress the importance of liquidity.”
  • $19.356 billion. GM’s cash on hand as of the end of the quarter.
  • $56.97 billion. The total stockholders’ deficit as of June 30. That’s up from $3.77 billion at the end of June 2007. And yet, people continue to try to rally the shares.
  • $4.55 million. The cost of insuring $10 million in GM bonds against default for five years (not including a $500,000 annual additional cost). That’s up from $4.2 million Thursday, according to Phoenix Partners Group.
  • $16.91. S&P 500 earnings per-share before including GM.
  • $15.29. S&P 500 earnings per-share for the second quarter, including GM’s GAAP results. GM’s earnings reduce S&P per-share earnings by 9.5%, according to Howard Silverblatt, equity index analyst at Standard & Poor’s.
  • 21.3%. GM’s U.S. auto sales market share, for the year-to-date.
  • 28.8%. GM’s U.S. auto sales market share, as of the end of 1999.”
Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Rochester "better than Vinfast" is a pretty low bar.
  • TheMrFreeze That new Ferrari looks nice but other than that, nothing.And VW having to put an air-cooled Beetle in its display to try and make the ID.Buzz look cool makes this classic VW owner sad 😢
  • Wolfwagen Is it me or have auto shows just turned to meh? To me, there isn't much excitement anymore. it's like we have hit a second malaise era. Every new vehicle is some cookie-cutter CUV. No cutting-edge designs. No talk of any great powertrains, or technological achievements. It's sort of expected with the push to EVs but there is no news on that front either. No new battery tech, no new charging tech. Nothing.
  • CanadaCraig You can just imagine how quickly the tires are going to wear out on a 5,800 lbs AWD 2024 Dodge Charger.
  • Luke42 I tried FSD for a month in December 2022 on my Model Y and wasn’t impressed.The building-blocks were amazing but sum of the all of those amazing parts was about as useful as Honda Sensing in terms of reducing the driver’s workload.I have a list of fixes I need to see in Autopilot before I blow another $200 renting FSD. But I will try it for free for a month.I would love it if FSD v12 lived up to the hype and my mind were changed. But I have no reason to believe I might be wrong at this point, based on the reviews I’ve read so far. [shrug]. I’m sure I’ll have more to say about it once I get to test it.
Next