Fields on EcoBoost: " I Call It the Great Taste, Less Filling School of Powertrain Technology"
OK, someone needs to tell Ford's Presidente de las Americas that FoMoCo didn't invent direct-injection turbocharged engine technology. Oh wait, someone did. A comment underneath The Detroit News' article: "Why is Ford getting all this attention just for catching up with the rest of the automotive world? VW, Audi, Subaru, Renault and a number of other manufacturers have had turbocharged direct injection engines for years. While it's nice to see Fords pulled its head out of its corporate ass for once, it isn't like they've done anything original." In fact, The DetN reports that "Ford began working on EcoBoost more than seven years ago"– only to be stymied by the marketing guys. And now it's rush, rush, rush. All that said, it's also worth noting that Fields floored the Eco-Boosted MKS and then claimed "This will put a smile on your face. But you get 20 percent better fuel economy with 15 percent less CO2." Note to Fields: not at WOT you don't.
Want to see how wonderful EcoBoost is? Click here.
More by Robert Farago
Comments
Join the conversation
Nullomondo: "The problem isn't bad marketing, it's non-existent marketing." Nary a word in any of the comments on this thread about Ford's less-than-stellar quality and reliability. They can make all the plans and dream up all the fancy, high-falutin' sounding technology in the world, but if they don't execute it in such a manner as to show potential buyers that they won't be constantly held hostage in their dealer's service department lounge, they won't sell any better than past Ford's.... Message to Mr. Fields, (captured so fetchingly in the pose made famous by Bill Clinton, BTW....nice touch!): "It's the reliability, stupid!"
Addressing the fuel-grade question, I've heard repeatedly that these engines will recommend 87 octane. Isn't that the whole advantage of coupling DI with turbo-charging? The higher compression ratio or a direct inject engine means less noncombusted fuel, increasing efficiency and eliminating the need for the anti-knock properties of premium fuels, right?