By on January 29, 2008

bilde3.jpg“It can be an expensive process to install the pumps and get the infrastructure ready to sell E85, so we’re offering as much assistance as we can to those retailers that have elected to sell E85.” So sayeth Mark Walters, Biofuels Director for the Indiana Corn Marketing Council. Apparently the "as much as we can bit" amounts to $5k per eligible gas station. Big whoop. Shell Oil– which doesn't pay for any of its franchisees to sell E85– pegs the cost of a corn juice compatible storage tank at $240k. And that doesn't include the time and hassle of local planning permission, or the disruption of construction to normal trade. According to the Brownfield Network (AG News for America), "Walters says that if the state grant is increased to $20,000 as proposed, the two combined should be very attractive to retailers." But not customers. At the moment, Indiana only has 100 E85 retailers, and you can bet that's not because consumers are clamoring for the stuff. [check out the podcast with Mr. Walters at the bottom of BN's post]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

3 Comments on “E85 Boondoggle of the Day: Indiana Corn Marketing Council’s $5k Grant to Gas Stations...”


  • avatar
    Raskolnikov

    Even though I live in Indiana (large corn producer) and my dad farms 400 acres of the stuff (big $$ for ethanol), I still wish we’d get on with making cellulosic ethanol, and leave the corn for Fritos.

    Has anyone figured out how to make fuel from those plastic grocery bags? I have a sh!t pot full of those.

  • avatar
    becurb

    red dawg :

    I live about 20 miles from the only E85 staion with-in a hundred miles. Sen Richard Lugar(R-Ind.) said in an interview when the station near me had finally finished the installation E85 would consistantly be 20-30 cents a gallon less the regular unleaded. Not so. At the station i pass frequently it is consistantly 20,30, and 40 cents a galloon higher !!!!!!! Coupled with the lower miles per gallon from E85, high cost and the severly limited availibilty it is no wonder it isn’t selling like we all lied to that it would.

    This seems like the Olds “diesel” engine all over again. The best way to kill this particular porcine idiocy is for consumers to vote with their wallets, and not purchase it. With higher prices and less MPG, that should not be difficult, fortunately.

    Of course, I have no doubt that the lobbists for this pork will clamor all the louder for more funds for more ethanol plants, which they will all swear will make ethanol cheaper…

    The correct answer of course is to kill the pork ADM and ConAgra receive, and hope the current stupidity does not kill the market for biomass ethanol.

    Just like the Olds “diesel” nearly killed the market for passenger diesel engines. :-)

  • avatar

    If Iowa wasn’t first on the list of primary states, we wouldn’t even be talking about corn ethanol. No offense to Iowans, but seriously. If eggplants were their cash crop, we’d be talking about running cars on eggplants. It’s a huge waste of time and resources all because politicians pander to this very small minority of Americans.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    Astigmatism - @jc130 This wins. EVERYTHING.
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1986 Buick Somerset

    ChiefPontiaxe - The Regal Somerset Edition started out in 1980, not 1985. My Cousin Stanley had one in two-tone navy and manila (both interior and exterior were...
  • Re: EPA Mandates Real-World Testing For All Automakers

    Land Ark - Well, I certain am not calling for the abolishment of EPA (they don’t refer to themselves as “The”) since Mrs. Land Ark...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    jc130 - People are “Fans of the Toyota Camry” in the same way they are fans of stainless steel refrigerators.
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    Frantz - On of many reasons leases are on the upswing for new cars is consumer concern for all the new technologies out in cars. Turbos have been used on long life vehicles for...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    VoGo - 28-cars-later, I hear you, but why should Toyota offer you a V6 Camry for 27K, when they can force you into a 37K EZ or a 32K Avalon? If the rest of the market is...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    jc130 - “Fans of the Toyota Camry…” Now there’s a straw man for you.
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1986 Buick Somerset

    PrincipalDan - My high school best friend had one in the early 1990s. Came off the “budget” lot at the Car Dealer his Dad was a salesman at. The trunk had...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    bomberpete - The 75-77 Buick V-6 had uneven crankshaft firing, but they improved it considerably in 78-79. We must have been lucky, because that 78 Century accelerated smoothly if...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    sirwired - Can a modern V-6 provide tons of power with pretty decent economy given the power produced? Sure! But the power (and certainly the economy) of a modern Turbo-4 (and...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India