By William C Montgomery
March 10, 2008 -
Professor W. Edwards Deming taught post-War Japan statistical process control. Toyota management applied Deming's lessons with characteristic discipline, refining the Yale grad's famous "14 points" to create their lean manufacturing system. Through it all, ToMoCo had one over-riding goal: to mimic and surpass the world's greatest automakers. Driving the new Toyota Sequoia back-to-back against its archetypal competition– the Chevy Tahoe and Ford Expedition– proves the old adage: be careful what you wish for.
Toyota's "homage" to the great American SUV is obvious at first glance. The new Sequoia looks like the offspring of an illicit tryst between the manly Ford Expedition King Ranch and sweet little miss White Diamond Tahoe LTZ. Baby Sequoia has her father's horizontal chrome grille and her mother's facial structure. It's a pastiche without panache, a me-too shape that displays the same lack of originality that's helped propel other Toyota models to stellar sales success.
Other than the slight "flame surfacing" on the Sequoia's sides (cribbed from BMW), the nose provides the model's only ToMoCo branding. (Again.) While the snout's a straight cop from the Sequoia's sister-under-the-skin (the Tundra), the designers were smart enough to ditch the faux vent that crosses the top of Tundra's grille like a thin John Waters mustache. The Sequoia's front and rear-end are also more squared-off than the pickup, and the beltline is higher.
As befits the SUV version of Toyota's super-sized pickup, the Sequoia's almost an inch wider, over an inch longer and 700 pounds heavier than its previous iteration. And yet the Sequoia is now only par for the course in the big-boned American SUV genre. In fact, the Sequoia is shorter in length than the King Ranch Expedition and shorter in stature that both the Ford and the Chevy. Even so, in Arctic Frost Pearl paint, the Sequoia's doors and side quarter panels appear positively glacial in their vastness.
The Sequoia Platinum is a new trim line above the standard SR5 and former top dog Limited. It's more than just a purdy paint job and blingy wheels. The Platinum coddles its passengers– both front and middle– in infinitely adjustable heated and cooled leather seats. The standard navigation system with thank-God backup camera is the centerpiece of an all-too-busy dashboard awash in clunky brittle plastics. Low-rent vinyl posing as leather covers the doors. Clearly, unavoidably, the Sequoia's cabin is not Toyota's best work.
No matter what guise you prize, the Sequoia's basic packaging fails to outclass the Chevy and Ford– except for third row passengers. Although the Ford's way backs' headroom and legroom are superior, the key metrics here are shoulder room and thigh support, which the Toyota supplies in ample amounts. Raise the retractable shades, fold down the [Platinum's] nine-inch DVD screen, pass out the wireless headphones and Mom and Dad will be blissfully (if only temporarily and only in their imagination) childless.
While it would be easy to conclude that this is the big rig's raison d'etre, any such misapprehension will be rectified the moment you fire-up Toyota's 381hp 5.7-liter phenom. The V8 growls to life like an irritated grizzly bear awakening from hibernation. Poke the well-placed pedal and the engine gives you a heavy metal power chord that beats anything produced by the [optional] 14-speaker 440-watt JBL stereo system. And the engine ain't just whistling Dixie; the Sequoia's 10k-pound tow rating makes it the boat-schlepper's top pick.
The powerplant motivates the 6045lbs leviathan with ridiculous ease. Provided you've got a platinum credit card to pay the man at the gas station (13/18 mpg), you can blast this big boy from zero to sixty in 6.2 seconds. Even though the Sequoia's class-leading brakes and fixed four-piston front calipers can haul her down from 60mph in 139ft., that's… nuts. Which is OK, ‘cause driving this porker is about as fun as tending a fussy baby.
Members of the Platinum club get to chose whether they want the Electronic Modulated Suspension (H-TEMS) set for sport or comfort. Unfortunately, dialing up Sport isn't sporting and Comfort isn't comfy. Despite a fully boxed frame, low-pressure gas-filled shock absorbers and hollow stabilizer bars, the ride is too jittery for wafting and wafts too much for romping.
The six-speed transmission is another kill-joy; it hunts for gears like cat hunting a room full of mice. Yes, you can take manual control of the tranny, but who does? Meanwhile, jostling in a perch high above highway pavement while the neurotic tranny busily searches for acceptance, drivers are charged with the chore of manning an extremely sloppy tiller. No fun.
So here we are. The Sequoia is a bland-looking, gargantuan, comfortable SUV with a five-star engine, a two-star interior and lousy handling dynamics. In Toyota's quest to become like Ford and GM, they've become just like Ford and GM. Yes, but… consider Toyota's Demming-sourced rep for reliability. The ToMoCo juggernaut rolls on.
82 Responses to “ 2008 Toyota Sequoia [Platinum] Review ”
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 » Show All Reverse Order
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 » Show All Reverse Order
Leave a Reply
Back to Top
You must be logged in to post a comment.
![2008 Toyota Sequoia [Platinum] earned a 3 star review from TTAC](http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wp-content/themes/ttac4.1.5/images/stars_white_3.gif)
Subscribe to Newsletter
More Reviews

Digg
del.icio.us
Blinklist
Furl
Netscape
Google
NewsVine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Windows Live
POWERED
March 10th, 2008 at 7:30 am
So, once well-to-do Mormons and Catholics get their Sequoias, when will ToyMoCo make me (a single agnostic tree-hugger) a fuel-efficient two-door sport hatch?
March 10th, 2008 at 7:35 am
Good review. But how does the Sequioa compare to the Mitsubishi Outlander, which also can have 3 rows of seating?
March 10th, 2008 at 8:44 am
6045 Lbs?!?
Good Lord.
March 10th, 2008 at 8:58 am
We have a 2002 Tundra at work. The inside is cheap and the plastic breaks all the time. The seats are falling apart already. However the engine - true to Toyota’s rep - has never flinched. I expect that we will not buy another truck for at least another ten years. By then the inside will make dollar store toys look high quality. If I was Toyota I would do the same thing. They are in this to make money.
March 10th, 2008 at 9:03 am
I think Toyota missed the niche without offering a longer version like the Suburban / Denali XL .
The performance of that leviathon is nothing short of amazing but I am surprised about chassis stiffness. I have those complaints with my 07 Denali. I guess it is hard to keep those monsters stiff without adding too much weight to the chassis.
March 10th, 2008 at 9:22 am
I tested a Tundra CrewMax Limited for a week last month, and I agree with everything you said both about the engine (absolutely incredible, if too thirsty) and the fit-and-finish being only average. But that engine - I couldn’t restrain myself to keep my right foot out of it. Whenever there was an opening in traffic or an on-ramp to attack (only straight ones, of course), I did, to the tune of just over 12 mpg.
This was a nice, fair review. It’s weird to see Toyota advertising these things as family haulers, since they’re so un-PC nowadays.
March 10th, 2008 at 9:41 am
Examining one of these closely at NAIAS, I was amazed at the cheapness of the plastics used for the front and rear center consoles. Very old school American, even the Americans generally do better these days. (Well, except for Chrysler.) On the other hand, those consoles are huge and contain multiple levels.
Will this tendency to quantity over quality impact reliability? Anyone who frequents TTAC knows that I’ve been developing some research to find out. Details here:
[url=http://www.truedelta.com/reliability.php]Vehicle reliability research[/url]
March 10th, 2008 at 9:57 am
Hey!!! Gas just went up again today!!!
It’s about $3.29 for a regular and is that an SUV?
March 10th, 2008 at 10:10 am
When do we get the “Grand Avalon”?
March 10th, 2008 at 10:11 am
Maybe there is a lesson to be learnt from this vehicle, you can see why Toyota makes so much money. There are so many carryover parts from the tundra on this vehicle. Grill, headlights, i’m sure at least the front doors are the same, the interior has the same Dashboard with the same horrible cheap feel plastic, do you really want to drive an overweight suv thats really a polished up pickup truck?