<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Buick LaCrosse Super Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:42:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: skygreenleopard</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-2/#comment-405172</link>
		<dc:creator>skygreenleopard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-405172</guid>
		<description>I agree with this review. I recently drove a plain-Jane Impala (don&#039;t ask why) and an SS version. While it had torque steer up the wazoo, the SS was a killer car for a rental weekend. Unfortunately, it was still a plain white Impala on the outside.

This car seems to be similar but even better. I kind of want to try one out now - under the radar, indeed. Hope Buick gets it perfect one day. This gives me a bit of hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I agree with this review. I recently drove a plain-Jane Impala (don&#8217;t ask why) and an SS version. While it had torque steer up the wazoo, the SS was a killer car for a rental weekend. Unfortunately, it was still a plain white Impala on the outside.</p>
<p>This car seems to be similar but even better. I kind of want to try one out now &#8211; under the radar, indeed. Hope Buick gets it perfect one day. This gives me a bit of hope.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BKW</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-2/#comment-399802</link>
		<dc:creator>BKW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 12:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-399802</guid>
		<description>In 1955, the CHP began buying only the Buick Century models because a CA Buick dealer made the CHP an offer they couldn&#039;t refuse. 

The Buick dealer offered a better price to the CHP, which had been buying Olds 88&#039;s from an LA Olds dealer since 1950. The dealer sold Buicks to the CHP at $200.00 below the invoice price. $200.00 was a lot of money back then. The Olds and Buick&#039;s were two door sedans, not four doors, nor two door Hardtops.

How do I know this? My family owned the Olds dealership that originally had the CHP contract.

Remember the old TV show &#039;Highway Patrol&#039; starring Broderick Crawford? Episodes shot prior to 1955 have Olds 88&#039;s, 1955 and later episodes featured Buicks.

btw: When I look at a 2008 Buick LaCrosse, what I see is a gussied up 1996 Regal with a fugly grille. 

You can dress a pig up to look glamorous,  but underneath, it&#039;s still the same old pig.

Frank Williams: Here&#039;s the original Buick code: Go back to the introduction of the portholes in 1949. 

The Special and Super had three port holes, the Roadmaster had four (no Century models till 1954).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->In 1955, the CHP began buying only the Buick Century models because a CA Buick dealer made the CHP an offer they couldn&#8217;t refuse. </p>
<p>The Buick dealer offered a better price to the CHP, which had been buying Olds 88&#8217;s from an LA Olds dealer since 1950. The dealer sold Buicks to the CHP at $200.00 below the invoice price. $200.00 was a lot of money back then. The Olds and Buick&#8217;s were two door sedans, not four doors, nor two door Hardtops.</p>
<p>How do I know this? My family owned the Olds dealership that originally had the CHP contract.</p>
<p>Remember the old TV show &#8216;Highway Patrol&#8217; starring Broderick Crawford? Episodes shot prior to 1955 have Olds 88&#8217;s, 1955 and later episodes featured Buicks.</p>
<p>btw: When I look at a 2008 Buick LaCrosse, what I see is a gussied up 1996 Regal with a fugly grille. </p>
<p>You can dress a pig up to look glamorous,  but underneath, it&#8217;s still the same old pig.</p>
<p>Frank Williams: Here&#8217;s the original Buick code: Go back to the introduction of the portholes in 1949. </p>
<p>The Special and Super had three port holes, the Roadmaster had four (no Century models till 1954).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geotpf</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-2/#comment-393931</link>
		<dc:creator>Geotpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-393931</guid>
		<description>No law enforcement agency would buy a Buick now.  The police package for W-bodies is in a Chevy Impala; they wouldn&#039;t make two W-Body cars with a police package, anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->No law enforcement agency would buy a Buick now.  The police package for W-bodies is in a Chevy Impala; they wouldn&#8217;t make two W-Body cars with a police package, anyways.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 50merc</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-2/#comment-393372</link>
		<dc:creator>50merc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-393372</guid>
		<description>The problem I have with the Super is just that--its name. &quot;Super&quot; is not only pretty generic (like &quot;LX&quot; or &quot;Custom&quot;), in Buick tradition the label refers to a luxury model slotted just under Roadmaster. It would have been better to call the V-8 LaCrosse &quot;Wildcat&quot; or &quot;Gran Sports.&quot; Buick used them in the past to refer to high-performance models.

If Buick had not cheapened the Century badge in recent years, that name would have been a great choice. It originated in the 30&#039;s to brag about the Century&#039;s ability to do a hundred. In 1955, the California Highway Patrol bought only Buick Centuries because they were good pursuit vehicles.

Come to think of it, maybe Buick would be smart to offer a LaCrosse in a law enforcement package. Good (and cheap) image-changing marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The problem I have with the Super is just that&#8211;its name. &#8220;Super&#8221; is not only pretty generic (like &#8220;LX&#8221; or &#8220;Custom&#8221;), in Buick tradition the label refers to a luxury model slotted just under Roadmaster. It would have been better to call the V-8 LaCrosse &#8220;Wildcat&#8221; or &#8220;Gran Sports.&#8221; Buick used them in the past to refer to high-performance models.</p>
<p>If Buick had not cheapened the Century badge in recent years, that name would have been a great choice. It originated in the 30&#8217;s to brag about the Century&#8217;s ability to do a hundred. In 1955, the California Highway Patrol bought only Buick Centuries because they were good pursuit vehicles.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, maybe Buick would be smart to offer a LaCrosse in a law enforcement package. Good (and cheap) image-changing marketing.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue adidas</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-2/#comment-392622</link>
		<dc:creator>blue adidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-392622</guid>
		<description>I’ve been in a couple of these. They’re quite nice, but disappointing in so many ways. Why does the front look like a Korean knockoff of a British car? Why does the rear end look like the automotive equivalent of pleated chinos? Does Buick realize that the large flat area of painted silver plastic on the center stack doesn’t remotely look like anodized aluminum? It’s a bummer because I really like the attention to detail on GM cars lately. But as solid as this car is, it’s very clear that the finishing touches of the LaCrosse reflects the tail end of GMs bad-old-days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I’ve been in a couple of these. They’re quite nice, but disappointing in so many ways. Why does the front look like a Korean knockoff of a British car? Why does the rear end look like the automotive equivalent of pleated chinos? Does Buick realize that the large flat area of painted silver plastic on the center stack doesn’t remotely look like anodized aluminum? It’s a bummer because I really like the attention to detail on GM cars lately. But as solid as this car is, it’s very clear that the finishing touches of the LaCrosse reflects the tail end of GMs bad-old-days.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LUNDQIK</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-392482</link>
		<dc:creator>LUNDQIK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-392482</guid>
		<description>Secretly I like Buicks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Secretly I like Buicks.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatdoiknow1</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-392042</link>
		<dc:creator>whatdoiknow1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 13:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-392042</guid>
		<description>On test drive of a FWD Maxima and you will quick come to understand why no one wants a LaCrosse.
Simply outclassed! Nissan has continuiously made the Maxima a  better car model after model. Even with Infiniti models that overlap with the Maxima Nissan is still committed to this model and it does show. 

GM on the otherhand has spent the last 20 years short-shafting their mid-sized and full-sized sedan and it clearly show in the lackluster designs and quality. The LaCrosse is best made use of as a premium retnal car. Renting one of these would be a please until you spend a couple of hours with GMs piss-poor ergonomics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->On test drive of a FWD Maxima and you will quick come to understand why no one wants a LaCrosse.<br />
Simply outclassed! Nissan has continuiously made the Maxima a  better car model after model. Even with Infiniti models that overlap with the Maxima Nissan is still committed to this model and it does show. </p>
<p>GM on the otherhand has spent the last 20 years short-shafting their mid-sized and full-sized sedan and it clearly show in the lackluster designs and quality. The LaCrosse is best made use of as a premium retnal car. Renting one of these would be a please until you spend a couple of hours with GMs piss-poor ergonomics.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghillie</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-391382</link>
		<dc:creator>ghillie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-391382</guid>
		<description>From the side it seems to have a very long nose.  

Is there a prize for most sheet metal forward of the front wheels?  If so, would this car win it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->From the side it seems to have a very long nose.  </p>
<p>Is there a prize for most sheet metal forward of the front wheels?  If so, would this car win it?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjacob9105</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-391312</link>
		<dc:creator>jjacob9105</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-391312</guid>
		<description>This is available in the L.A. area.

http://www.reynolds1915.com/VehicleDetails/989934644

They do lose their value quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This is available in the L.A. area.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reynolds1915.com/VehicleDetails/989934644" rel="nofollow">http://www.reynolds1915.com/VehicleDetails/989934644</a></p>
<p>They do lose their value quickly.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickR</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-391242</link>
		<dc:creator>NickR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-391242</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a respectable machine.  

Now if GM would actually advertise it.  Honestly, I keep up on &#039;car things&#039; and I didn&#039;t know it existed until I read this review.

GM, please, if you are going to build something worth selling...&lt;em&gt;sell &lt;/em&gt;it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Sounds like a respectable machine.  </p>
<p>Now if GM would actually advertise it.  Honestly, I keep up on &#8216;car things&#8217; and I didn&#8217;t know it existed until I read this review.</p>
<p>GM, please, if you are going to build something worth selling&#8230;<em>sell </em>it!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Karesh</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-391192</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Karesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-391192</guid>
		<description>The review doesn&#039;t mention this car&#039;s (and the Impala SS&#039;s, and the Grand Prix GXP&#039;s) weakest aspect: the four-speed automatic. The gears are way too tall and widely spaced to exploit half the engine&#039;s potential at at around town speeds. 

That aside, for driving enthusiasts the discontinued Pontiac is the way to go. It handles surprisingly well for a powerful front-driver--and much better than the Impala SS. I haven&#039;t driven the Buick, but assume it handles much more like the Chevy than the Pontiac.

Sadly, none of these cars are included yet in TrueDelta&#039;s reliability survey. The people who buy them aren&#039;t terribly active online.

http://www.truedelta.com/reliability.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The review doesn&#8217;t mention this car&#8217;s (and the Impala SS&#8217;s, and the Grand Prix GXP&#8217;s) weakest aspect: the four-speed automatic. The gears are way too tall and widely spaced to exploit half the engine&#8217;s potential at at around town speeds. </p>
<p>That aside, for driving enthusiasts the discontinued Pontiac is the way to go. It handles surprisingly well for a powerful front-driver&#8211;and much better than the Impala SS. I haven&#8217;t driven the Buick, but assume it handles much more like the Chevy than the Pontiac.</p>
<p>Sadly, none of these cars are included yet in TrueDelta&#8217;s reliability survey. The people who buy them aren&#8217;t terribly active online.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.truedelta.com/reliability.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.truedelta.com/reliability.php</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvrboy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-391172</link>
		<dc:creator>tvrboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-391172</guid>
		<description>This car does have its charms, but I&#039;d rather have an accord, solara, hey or altima coupe.  Nothing against GM, I just think those cars look about eight times better than the LaCrosse.  In the end, I wouldn&#039;t buy a LaCrosse Super, but I&#039;m glad it exists!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This car does have its charms, but I&#8217;d rather have an accord, solara, hey or altima coupe.  Nothing against GM, I just think those cars look about eight times better than the LaCrosse.  In the end, I wouldn&#8217;t buy a LaCrosse Super, but I&#8217;m glad it exists!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnster</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-390952</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-390952</guid>
		<description>I think you need to update your specs, Michael.  According to the Buick website, the 2008 LaCrosse CSX (with the 3.6 liter V-6 as standard) is no longer available.  And the LaCrosse Super comes with the 5.3 liter V-8 as standard (instead of the 3.6 liter V-6 that&#039;s listed as being standard).  

It&#039;s a pity because the 3.6 liter V-6 sounds like the engine to get.  They must need them for all of their Enclave/Acadia/Outlook crossovers and Malibu/Aura mid-size cars.

Also, you didn&#039;t mention the cramped rear seat in such a large and heavy car.  And it seems pricey for what you get for the money.  But then, you can look forward to big discounts, I&#039;m sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think you need to update your specs, Michael.  According to the Buick website, the 2008 LaCrosse CSX (with the 3.6 liter V-6 as standard) is no longer available.  And the LaCrosse Super comes with the 5.3 liter V-8 as standard (instead of the 3.6 liter V-6 that&#8217;s listed as being standard).  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a pity because the 3.6 liter V-6 sounds like the engine to get.  They must need them for all of their Enclave/Acadia/Outlook crossovers and Malibu/Aura mid-size cars.</p>
<p>Also, you didn&#8217;t mention the cramped rear seat in such a large and heavy car.  And it seems pricey for what you get for the money.  But then, you can look forward to big discounts, I&#8217;m sure.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edgett</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-390822</link>
		<dc:creator>edgett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-390822</guid>
		<description>When profit is taken into consideration, I&#039;d guess that Buick&#039;s larger volume does not equal the profits made on Acura and Infiniti.

Then again, GM has been selling cars at cost for years in order to push their trucks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->When profit is taken into consideration, I&#8217;d guess that Buick&#8217;s larger volume does not equal the profits made on Acura and Infiniti.</p>
<p>Then again, GM has been selling cars at cost for years in order to push their trucks&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accurate_to_the_Vector</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-390812</link>
		<dc:creator>Accurate_to_the_Vector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-390812</guid>
		<description>When the hell are they just going to kill Buick? Cadillac has the high quality GM rep and cool image, which it deserves. Some of the time.

Seriously, who would by a Buick that wouldn&#039;t buy a Lexus? The same old farts that buy these cars are the same old farts that want a vehicle that they can pass down when the Will&#039;s being read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->When the hell are they just going to kill Buick? Cadillac has the high quality GM rep and cool image, which it deserves. Some of the time.</p>
<p>Seriously, who would by a Buick that wouldn&#8217;t buy a Lexus? The same old farts that buy these cars are the same old farts that want a vehicle that they can pass down when the Will&#8217;s being read.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juniper</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-390732</link>
		<dc:creator>Juniper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-390732</guid>
		<description>the trends may be in the wrong direction, but Buick still outsells Acura and Infiniti.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->the trends may be in the wrong direction, but Buick still outsells Acura and Infiniti.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romanjetfighter</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-390712</link>
		<dc:creator>romanjetfighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-390712</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s curvy like the Azera. I like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It&#8217;s curvy like the Azera. I like it!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GBG</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-390492</link>
		<dc:creator>GBG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-390492</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;No steering wheel squirm to rattle the ice in your Manhattan.&lt;/em&gt;

Well, I like my Manhattans up, so that was never a problem for me. Must say I appreciate quiet. Most of my driving is hour long chunks. I used to take asprin before hopping into our &#039;84 Jetta. There wasnt a surface or component of the dashboard that didnt rattle on that car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>No steering wheel squirm to rattle the ice in your Manhattan.</em></p>
<p>Well, I like my Manhattans up, so that was never a problem for me. Must say I appreciate quiet. Most of my driving is hour long chunks. I used to take asprin before hopping into our &#8216;84 Jetta. There wasnt a surface or component of the dashboard that didnt rattle on that car.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Holzman</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-390302</link>
		<dc:creator>David Holzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-390302</guid>
		<description>those portholes are called cruiserline ventiports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->those portholes are called cruiserline ventiports.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solo84</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-389872</link>
		<dc:creator>solo84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-389872</guid>
		<description>@thalter:

you can&#039;t get the Super with a front bench seat, but you can get the lesser LaCrosse&#039;s with a front bench seat.

you better act quick though if you want one with a front bench seat. they are selling out QUICK!*


*(please note sarcasm)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@thalter:</p>
<p>you can&#8217;t get the Super with a front bench seat, but you can get the lesser LaCrosse&#8217;s with a front bench seat.</p>
<p>you better act quick though if you want one with a front bench seat. they are selling out QUICK!*</p>
<p>*(please note sarcasm)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoSubstitute</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-389582</link>
		<dc:creator>NoSubstitute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-389582</guid>
		<description>Hertz gave me a (non-Super) LaCrosse the week after I&#039;d been driving a loaner ES300. I&#039;d say the two cars were virtually indistinguishable.

Brand is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Hertz gave me a (non-Super) LaCrosse the week after I&#8217;d been driving a loaner ES300. I&#8217;d say the two cars were virtually indistinguishable.</p>
<p>Brand is all.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynamic88</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-389312</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynamic88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-389312</guid>
		<description>Put me down for quiet cabins too.   It&#039;s one of the things that I don&#039;t like about the Hondas I&#039;ve had - too noisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Put me down for quiet cabins too.   It&#8217;s one of the things that I don&#8217;t like about the Hondas I&#8217;ve had &#8211; too noisy.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt B</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-388722</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-388722</guid>
		<description>@quasimondo
&lt;em&gt;The real question is will those who read TTAC like GM products?&lt;/em&gt;

I like Vettes..and as I&#039;m so often reminded..it&#039;s a Chevy.
I also like the Acadia, CTS, GTO and Lucerne (for what it is).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@quasimondo<br />
<em>The real question is will those who read TTAC like GM products?</em></p>
<p>I like Vettes..and as I&#8217;m so often reminded..it&#8217;s a Chevy.<br />
I also like the Acadia, CTS, GTO and Lucerne (for what it is).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 86er</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-387832</link>
		<dc:creator>86er</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-387832</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;thalter:
Also, what is up with that completely flat dash? Straight out of the 70’s. Is there a version of this car with a bench front seat perhaps?&lt;/em&gt;

Nope, but you can get one in the Lucerne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>thalter:<br />
Also, what is up with that completely flat dash? Straight out of the 70’s. Is there a version of this car with a bench front seat perhaps?</em></p>
<p>Nope, but you can get one in the Lucerne.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thalter</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/comment-page-1/#comment-387782</link>
		<dc:creator>thalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008-buick-lacrosse-super-review/#comment-387782</guid>
		<description>Ya, I saw the front overhang as well.  I&#039;m not sure who thought the side profile was its best angle, because it clearly is not.

Also, what is up with that completely flat dash?  Straight out of the 70&#039;s.  Is there a version of this car with a bench front seat perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Ya, I saw the front overhang as well.  I&#8217;m not sure who thought the side profile was its best angle, because it clearly is not.</p>
<p>Also, what is up with that completely flat dash?  Straight out of the 70&#8217;s.  Is there a version of this car with a bench front seat perhaps?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 61/168 queries in 0.121 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 09:44:32 -->