ML500 Review

Terry Parkhurst
by Terry Parkhurst

The Upper Middle Fork road into Washington State’s Snoqualmie National Forest is the kind of road a SUV buyer sees all the time– in glossy ads. It’s a roller-coaster ride of immense potholes, fist-sized rocks and ankle-deep snow that carves through an ancient, awe-inspiring landscape. As such, it’s the perfect testing ground for the Mercedes-Benz ML500: a vehicle appealing to well-heeled suburbanites who want to know they could drive their $63k SUV down treacherous roads like this, at speed, even though they never will.

New flash: if they want to, they can. More importantly, the ML is finally ready for its close-up. In both proportion and detail, Merc’s off-roader is not so much re-styled as re-designed. Integrated fender flares, a sharply raked windshield and a longer and wider body give the new ML a cleaner, more form-following-function deportment. The big chrome grille in the nose may be a bit garish, and the Merc's prow may have grown like Pinocchio’s compared to the previous model's, but there’s a point to it (literally): aerodynamics. The surface development leads to sides with gentle highlights rather than cutting edges. The back, meanwhile, cuts off like a Bush press conference gone bad.

The previous generation ML’s fixtures and fittings were more Chevy Malibu than Mercedes Benz. The new model redresses the problem with the kind of soft touch plastics previously reserved for a home-brew espresso machine, and leather seats as soothingly tactile as a well-groomed Labrador. To keep it party real, Mercedes decorated the cabin with more chrome than you’ll find in a ‘60’s yank tank. Deploying the material on the four-armed steering wheel and the two-pod instrument panel brings the bling.

Stunters and flossers engage the ML’s killer ICE through a read-out display that looks like the War Room in “Doctor Strangelove;” which dovetails nicely with a navigation system boasting all the charm of HAL in “2001.” (Luddites can retreat to knobs and map-based martial strife.) To initiate forward motion, drivers can twiddle paddles on the back of the steering wheel or manipulate a stubby stalk jutting off the steering wheel. Press the lever down and the letter “D” appears in the instrument panel. Push it up and, counter-intuitively enough, you’re heading backwards. Push the bugger in, and there’s your “N.” And there you have it.

Twisting the key fob activates the ML’s 5.0-liter, 24-valve V8. Not that you’d know it; the ML is quieter than a Jesuit study hall. As you’d expect (and hope) from a German V8, the ML’s runs silent, runs deep. More specifically, there are 339 pound-feet of twist underfoot between 2700 and 4750 rpm. That’s enough grunt to facilitate seriously smooth takeoffs, easy cruising and relatively safe see-you-later sucker maneuvers. The ML’s smooth spinning mill is hooked-up to Merc’s sublime seven-speed auto-box, which answers any accelerative question with the appropriate gear and instantaneous thrust.

The ML’s suspension displays equal grace and charm. Mercedes switched from ladder-frame to unibody construction, stretched the M-class’s wheelbase, lowered the ride height and widened the front and rear tracks. This new set-up complements the new suspension set-up: front control arms (front) and a four-link axle (rear). So equipped, the ML does that Mercedes magic carpet thing; on the open road to your off-road adventure, there’s barely a jolt. Even while negotiating potholes that looked like the aftermath of roadside bombs, the ML never loses its carma. Or its footing. The ML maintains excellent directional stability in the corners. The suspension set-up limits body roll to an initial heave, after which the ML hangs on with both tenacity and poise.

To broaden their market and satisfy skiers, Mercedes’ engineers replaced the old ML’s two-speed transfer case with a full-time four-wheel drive system using three conventional open differentials. (An upcoming off-road package will offer locking center and rear differentials.) They also fitted a four-wheel electronic traction control system that varies torque from front-to-rear and side-to-side. It’s no Rubicon runner, but the ML will slide around a dirt road with a midget racer's agility. Of course, the ML effortlessly dismisses muddy fields, quickly traverses torrential rain and easily surmounts snow (with the proper footwear). In sum, the ML is the kind of machine that gets you out of any trouble short of genuine boulder business.

The Mercedes ML500 is the Forest Gump of sport utilities. Wheel it into a city setting– where soccer Moms desperately need those stinkin’ badges– and the ML fits right in. It’s safe, comfortable, a bit bling and ever-so chi-chi. Conversely, dump the ML into a rural locale– where SUV drivers have the “no guts, no glory” philosophy tattooed on their forehead– and you’re good to go. Good old boys (with lots of good old cash) and suburbanites (with lots of good old cash) have found their ideal rig.

Terry Parkhurst
Terry Parkhurst

57 years old, male, shares space with a cat. Likes vintage Volvos and has photography as a hobby.

More by Terry Parkhurst

Comments
Join the conversation
  • Wolfwagen Pennsylvania - Two long straights, 1 medium straight, 1 super short straight and a bunch of curves all on one end
  • Haze3 EV median weight is in the range of 4500-5500lbs, similar to the low end of full size pickup trucks and SUV's or typical mid-size PU's and SUV's. Obviously, EV Hummers and PU's are heavier but, on average, EV=PU or mid/full SUV is about right. EV's currently account for ~1% of the cars on the road. PU's account for 17% and SUV's count for over 40%. If we take out light SUV's, then call it 30% SUV or so. So, large-ish PU's and SUV's, together, account for ~50% of the US fleet vs 1% for EV's. As such, the fleet is ALREADY heavy. The problem is that EV's will be making the currently lighter 50% heavier, not that PU/SUV haven't already done most of the damage on avg mass.Sure, the issue is real but EV responsibility is not. If you want to get after heavies, that means getting after PU/SUV's (the current problem by 40-50x) first and foremost.
  • Redapple2 Telluride over Acadian (sic-tip cap-canada). 1 better car. 2 60 % us/can content vs 39 THIRTY NINE for an "American" car. 3 no UAW labor. Smart people drive Tellurides. Not so smart for the GMC. Dont support the Evil GM Vampire.!
  • Theflyersfan My dad had a 1998 C280 that was rock solid reliable until around 80,000 miles and then it wasn't. Corey might develop a slight right eyelid twitch right about now, but it started with a sunroof that leaked. And the water likely damaged some electric components because soon after the leaks developed, the sunroof stopped working. And then the electrical gremlins took hold. Displays that flickered at times, lights that sometimes decided illumination was for wimps so stayed home, and then the single wiper issue. That thing decided to eat motors. He loved that car but knew when to fold the hand. So he bought a lightly used, off lease E-class. Had that for less than two years before he was ready to leave it in South Philly, keys in the ignition, doors unlocked, and a "Take it please" sign on the windshield. He won't touch another Benz now.
  • Detlump A lot of people buy SUVs because they're easier to get in and out of. After decades of longer, lower, wider it was refreshing to have easier ingress/egress offered by an SUV.Ironically, the ease of getting in and out of my Highlander is very similar to my 56 Cadillac.
Next