Nissan Altima SE-R Review

Admin
by Admin

Accord and Camry owners: "You're Welcome." At the risk of sounding sniffy, Toyota and Honda owners owe a large debt of gratitude to Nissan. Without the Altima, rival pink-slippers might still be trundling around in severely underpowered appliances. Rewind to 2002, when Nissan lit a fire under the collective backsides of every carmaker in the family sedan segment. At the time, Altima's haute-couture shape and Tabasco-infused engine gave competing engineers gray hair– and their marching papers. How else do you explain today's 240hp Accord?

That was then. And this is… later. Fortunately, while Nissan's busied itself immolating the wick at both ends of their considerable lineup, they haven't lost sight of the car that put them back in the game. I submit Exhibit 'SE-R'. Okay, so the new uber-Altima only boasts a modest bump in horsepower (10) and an extra ratio (6) in the manual gearbox. But don't be misled: the revised Altima is no trim-and-tape proposition designed to hold the fort until reinforcements arrive. It's yet another leap forward for Nissan's standard bearer.

In SE-R guise, the Altima's sheet metal has aged more gracefully than Heather Locklear. A gentle nip/tuck up front, tastefully restrained aero kit, purposefully lowered stance and the sexiest OEM wheels this side of the prancing horse make the Camry, Accord and Mazda6 look positively demure. It's a convincing renovation of an intrinsically attractive design. The SE-R blings the noise with projector-style xenons, black chrome dipped light housings, up-rated 12.6" front discs (whose calipers sport bold 'SE-R' insignias) and large-diameter dual exhausts.

Inside, the SE-R benefits from a much-needed trip to finishing school. While Matron retained the car's fundamentally sound ergonomics, she arranged higher-quality plastics throughout the cabin. Although the specter of discount motoring still lingers in places (the armrest's storage latches are particularly cheap and nasty), the SE-R can now hold its head high in mixed company. It's pretty hip too; what with power everything and a BOSE in-dash CD changer with standard-fit XM. Racy close-cropped leather seats look and feel the part, though slightly larger side bolsters wouldn't go amiss. A bank of three auxiliary telltales punctuating the center of the dash (temp, volts, and a comically useless MPG gauge) completes the transformation.

Turn the key and the SE-R's 24-valve, 3.5L VQ-series V6 capers to life. In a shameless display of potential power, the tach needle charges up the tach before relenting to idle. Prod the accelerator and the SE-R derestricted exhaust speaks with fantastically guttural authority. Slot the slightly long-of-throw gearshift into first, put the damage on the accelerator and drop the clutch. The SE-R runs to 60mph in just over six seconds, and does so without any electronic nannies putting the clamps on driver ebullience.

That's right: a front-wheel driver marshalling 260hp without traction control that doesn't smoke the forward tires every time you put the smack down. Sure, if you floor the SE-R on a pockmarked, knotted road she'll make for the brush like a truffle pig on a zephyr of prized fungi. But stick to the smoother stuff, goad the ponies with a bit of forethought and sensitivity, and the SE-R battens down the (hot) hatches and just plain hauls ass.

The augmented Altima gives a good account of itself when the road turns to fusilli, too, thanks to 18" 45-series Z-rated Bridgestones, re-valved shocks, stiffer springs and thicker anti-roll bars front/rear. In fact, the SE-R's absolute limit of adhesion is appreciably higher than garden-variety Altima SE's, though the steering effort could do with a bit of upwards ratcheting. Drop anchor and the ABS/EBD-abetted binders arrest SE-R's 3,200lbs. with repeatable alacrity. Admittedly, the car's raucous pipes and taut underpinnings might make for tiresome commuting, but for enthusiasts karmic balance is only as far away as the next stretch of open tarmac.

One minor snag: overlap. With the Altima SE-R within a whisker of the Maxima by most metrics, Nissan has optimistically crowded its showrooms. Compounding this first among equals dilemma is the bargain Infiniti G35, which routes power through God's own rear wheels AND boasts higher-quality and a more prestigious badge (for a premium of just $1,400). That's a lot of mid-size four-doors to have sunning under one corporate parasol.

But forget the inter-showroom cannibalism for a minute. Seek out your favorite twisty onramp. Whir the windows down and bury your right foot, deploying all the SE-R's horses full in sound and measure. Row through the first few gears, then drop into sixth and marvel as the SE-R hunkers down, dispatching mile after mile with ludicrous ease. I guarantee you won't be wishing yourself behind the wheel of a rival product, from inside OR outside the Nissan fold. And for that, SE-R drivers should be truly grateful.

Admin
Admin

More by Admin

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Bear Bear on Mar 22, 2007

    Hey correction this car is rated at 260 horse power and the non SE-R models simply 3.5 SE or SL were rated at 240 horse power then later it got a bump to 245.This is a great car and I can personally vouch for it.With this much performance for under 28k it eclipses or rivals that costing almost twice as much!In fact the performance is so good that it is right there with the 350Z in stright line performance as well as the Acura TL type S and can definetly keep up with the G-35 Coupe or sedan.Great bang for the buck and it is even roomier than the TL G-35 sedan and the likes of any 3 series bimmer or C, and E class Benz.( 240 and even E-350.I have to say though lets be fair and not compare to the Infiniti line because after all it is Nissan made.

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next