Subaru Forester XS LL Bean Review

Admin
by Admin

Subaru has remained 'willfully odd' for eons. The Japanese brand's long-held construction tenets– horizontally-opposed powerplants, all-wheel-drive and eccentric styling– have only recently been embraced by the masses. Okay, so America's roads aren't exactly awash in boxer-engines, but controversial styling is certainly making a resurgence, and we all know how that AWD car/truck thing worked out. Most manufacturers now have at least one car-based 'cute ute' in their showrooms, from Honda's CR-V to the Saturn Vue and Hyundai's roly-poly new Tucson.

With the massive success of its Outback lineup, it comes as no surprise that Subaru decided to fit some lifts and extra-tall glazing on its Impreza platform in search of a few more sales. The resulting Forester is an enigmatic little toolbox with many charms, but an unclear role in the family constellation.

Our L.L. Bean-spec XS tester arrived in 'Woodland Green,' a verdant hue well-suited to the vehicle's boxy angularity and inner-hippy ethos. While the XS is hardly exciting enough to command an adolescent's wall space, it's the most convincing Forester iteration yet. This is particularly true up front, where furrowed-brow headlamps and large fog lamps forge a strong first impression. The aggressive visage compliments the usual off-the-rack SUV telltales: ribbed lower cladding, blistered fenders and a roof rack atop its Popemobile greenhouse.

Despite its butch posturing, the Forester struggles to shake off the dreaded 'station wagon' persona. The SUV boasts above-average ground clearance, yet remains visibly shorter than most everything else in its class (a result of its low beltline/high glass quotient). It's the Chrysler 300 School of Design overturned: big greenhouse, narrow band of sheet metal.

Inside, the Forester's 'granola-liberal' heritage makes nice with the upwardly-mobile L.L. Bean specification. In the main, this juxtaposition pleases (luxuriously practical wipe-clean heated leather seats above industrial-grade rubber mats), but occasionally chafes (the stereo musters better weather band reception than basic FM). The XS' panoramic sunroof is its best model-specific feature: a homecoming queen's dream. The Forester's rear seats are a bit tight for the long-stemmed, but the overall ergonomics are sound, the panel fitments spot-on and most materials seem ready to go the distance.

Unfortunately, the driver's helm must be ratcheted to its top station to obtain the full-on SUV driving position so prized by desperate housewives. The resulting perch makes for an awkward seating position and places the Forester's low beltline in the middle of the driver's comfort zone. The apparent lack of lateral protection creates a disconcerting sense of vulnerability that belies the Forester's NHTSA's five-star acclaim– a conundrum best mitigated by adopting a lower personal center of gravity.

If the Forester's height fails to pay psychological dividends, at least it keeps the vehicle's mass low in the chassis. The XS can make short work of everything from rugged trails to the morning commute to undulating twisties– without making its driver feel tipsy. A fully independent suspension, symmetrical all-wheel drive and rear limited-slip differential contribute to the vehicle's class-leading handling. The steering is a skosh light, but acceptably accurate given the rather compromised sixteen-inch Yokohama Geolandars that connect it to the road.

Sadly, goading our green Bean failed to reveal any potential for WRC-style hooliganism. The blame falls squarely upon the XS' drivetrain. Plugging a 165-horse 2.5-liter into an intrinsically pudgy SUV isn't exactly a recipe for rapidity– especially when power routs through a four-speed automatic. The setup can propel the Forester at a reasonable clip, but the drivetrain must work hard (and loud) to achieve anything approaching genuine velocity. This is particularly true on the climb, when laden with kin and kit. The Forester's flat-four has an interesting acoustic signature, but sporting drivers will still wish for a little less conversation and a little more action.

The Forester's most troublesome aspect is its lack of brake feel; the left pedal on this L.L. was as spongy as a certain square-trousered cartoon icon. Around town the situation is a sour footnote. In fast technical sequences, when proper modulation becomes a far more pressing issue, the Forester's brakes ultimately retard much of the goodwill its suspension engenders. In the SUV's defense, simulated straight-line panic stops remain short and true, courtesy standard anti-lock control and electronic brake force distribution.

Fortunately, the Forester XT solves most these gripes with its significantly more powerful turbocharged engine and [available] manual transmission. Pistonheads may also wish to note that Fuji Heavy's upsized-for-'05 Outback XT Wagon boasts even greater grunt and better handing both on AND off the bitumen. In fact, unless you're attracted to whatever driveway cachet the L.L. Bean badge affords, either alternative is a better choice. Maybe that's just Subaru being willfully odd again– perhaps they like being their own toughest competitor.

Admin
Admin

More by Admin

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Sandralorrain Sandralorrain on Sep 25, 2016

    This was such a good read! My husband and I just bought our first Subaru Forester (a dream car) 2005 LLBean. (Yes, it's 2016 and the newer models are well, new and shiny but when you're kinda "young, broke, and fabulous" (recommended reading) it's financially prudent to purchase used :)) I love how the Subaru has remained 'willfully odd', and I love "the vehicle's boxy angularity and inner-hippy ethos". We got what they had on the lot: gold w/ beige interior. Of course I wanted a sage green or some kind of cool olive green I saw on the road the other day---but I am happy with our 'willfully odd' looking family car.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next